Lue keskustelun säännöt.
Prinssi Harry ei taida olla penaalin terävin kynä
06.01.2023 |
Taitaa kulkea suvussa, setänsä Andrew on samanlainen neropatti.
Kommentit (46129)
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Nyt on myös Harryn lennonopettajan sanoja väännelty. Hän on joutunut puolestaan korjaamaan asioita omalla facebook-seinällään. Julkinen postaus, Michael Booley.
I WANT THE TRUTH TO BE KNOWN. THIS POST IS PUBLIC, PLEASE SHARE MY COMMENTS FAR AND WIDE TO THE BELOW ARTICLE IN ORDER TO EXPOSE THE DELIBERATE DECEPTION BY THE PRESS !
I am Michael Booley, Harry's former Sgt Major flying instructor, quoted in this article. Out of the blue, I was contacted by the press to be made aware they were writing articles and as I was named in Harry's book "Spare" I was offered an opportunity to comment on it. I was completely unaware of this. As I had not seen it, I was then provided with an inaccurate version of the book (translated) and in response I expressed my concerns about any possible detrimental narratives from the outset. I later saw the English version and highlighted the differences to the press.
I was then assured that if I offered any comments, they would be reported on accurately. Stupidly and against my better judgement, I proceeded on trust. I made it absolutely clear that Harry was an exceptional student and I had nothing but the utmost respect for him. I highlighted some inaccuracies in the book, in particular reference to the flying sorties, but felt that they were probably not Harry's words and highly likely to be dramatised due to the fact that the book was Ghost Written. I did not know who the ghost writer was and certainly did not blame him. Not once did I say anything derogatory about Prince Harry and I certainly never said it was "complete fantasy" as the article headlines would have you believe. I made it clear to the reporters that I would not approve of anything derogatory and yet here we are. I also made it clear that I myself am suffering with complex PTSD and am under treatment for it and any misquotes or twists could potentially impact my health and well-being. I feel let down and betrayed by them. I also feel foolish for having listened to their assurances of trust and honesty. I should have know better. I certainly did not ask for or receive any payment, as some above comments suggest and am very despondent about how this article has been portrayed !
"Ei oo Harryn vika, jos on on väärää tietoa ja valheita, kyllä se on sen haamukirjottajan syy. Tahalleen tehty."
Just joo. 🙄
Harry luki itse kirjan äänikirjaksi. Ei älynnyt korjata tekstiä?
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Nyt on myös Harryn lennonopettajan sanoja väännelty. Hän on joutunut puolestaan korjaamaan asioita omalla facebook-seinällään. Julkinen postaus, Michael Booley.
I WANT THE TRUTH TO BE KNOWN. THIS POST IS PUBLIC, PLEASE SHARE MY COMMENTS FAR AND WIDE TO THE BELOW ARTICLE IN ORDER TO EXPOSE THE DELIBERATE DECEPTION BY THE PRESS !
I am Michael Booley, Harry's former Sgt Major flying instructor, quoted in this article. Out of the blue, I was contacted by the press to be made aware they were writing articles and as I was named in Harry's book "Spare" I was offered an opportunity to comment on it. I was completely unaware of this. As I had not seen it, I was then provided with an inaccurate version of the book (translated) and in response I expressed my concerns about any possible detrimental narratives from the outset. I later saw the English version and highlighted the differences to the press.
I was then assured that if I offered any comments, they would be reported on accurately. Stupidly and against my better judgement, I proceeded on trust. I made it absolutely clear that Harry was an exceptional student and I had nothing but the utmost respect for him. I highlighted some inaccuracies in the book, in particular reference to the flying sorties, but felt that they were probably not Harry's words and highly likely to be dramatised due to the fact that the book was Ghost Written. I did not know who the ghost writer was and certainly did not blame him. Not once did I say anything derogatory about Prince Harry and I certainly never said it was "complete fantasy" as the article headlines would have you believe. I made it clear to the reporters that I would not approve of anything derogatory and yet here we are. I also made it clear that I myself am suffering with complex PTSD and am under treatment for it and any misquotes or twists could potentially impact my health and well-being. I feel let down and betrayed by them. I also feel foolish for having listened to their assurances of trust and honesty. I should have know better. I certainly did not ask for or receive any payment, as some above comments suggest and am very despondent about how this article has been portrayed !
"Ei oo Harryn vika, jos on on väärää tietoa ja valheita, kyllä se on sen haamukirjottajan syy. Tahalleen tehty."
Just joo. 🙄
Luulis Harryn lukeneen kirjansa läpi ennen sen julkaisua. Katsoneen että asiat on oikein. Varsinkin ne jotka koskee muita ihmisiä ja voi aiheuttaa heille ongelmia.
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Nyt on myös Harryn lennonopettajan sanoja väännelty. Hän on joutunut puolestaan korjaamaan asioita omalla facebook-seinällään. Julkinen postaus, Michael Booley.
I WANT THE TRUTH TO BE KNOWN. THIS POST IS PUBLIC, PLEASE SHARE MY COMMENTS FAR AND WIDE TO THE BELOW ARTICLE IN ORDER TO EXPOSE THE DELIBERATE DECEPTION BY THE PRESS !
I am Michael Booley, Harry's former Sgt Major flying instructor, quoted in this article. Out of the blue, I was contacted by the press to be made aware they were writing articles and as I was named in Harry's book "Spare" I was offered an opportunity to comment on it. I was completely unaware of this. As I had not seen it, I was then provided with an inaccurate version of the book (translated) and in response I expressed my concerns about any possible detrimental narratives from the outset. I later saw the English version and highlighted the differences to the press.
I was then assured that if I offered any comments, they would be reported on accurately. Stupidly and against my better judgement, I proceeded on trust. I made it absolutely clear that Harry was an exceptional student and I had nothing but the utmost respect for him. I highlighted some inaccuracies in the book, in particular reference to the flying sorties, but felt that they were probably not Harry's words and highly likely to be dramatised due to the fact that the book was Ghost Written. I did not know who the ghost writer was and certainly did not blame him. Not once did I say anything derogatory about Prince Harry and I certainly never said it was "complete fantasy" as the article headlines would have you believe. I made it clear to the reporters that I would not approve of anything derogatory and yet here we are. I also made it clear that I myself am suffering with complex PTSD and am under treatment for it and any misquotes or twists could potentially impact my health and well-being. I feel let down and betrayed by them. I also feel foolish for having listened to their assurances of trust and honesty. I should have know better. I certainly did not ask for or receive any payment, as some above comments suggest and am very despondent about how this article has been portrayed !
"Ei oo Harryn vika, jos on on väärää tietoa ja valheita, kyllä se on sen haamukirjottajan syy. Tahalleen tehty."
Just joo. 🙄
Eli et ymmärtänyt jutun pointtia. Booleylle annettiin lehden jostain kehittämä tarina Harryn kirjan tekstinä, johon Booley kommentoi aluksi. Kun hän sai käsiinsä aidon tekstin, hän tajusi tulleensa kusetuksi Mirrorin toimesta ja halusi korjata aiempia virheelliselle pohjalle antamiaan lausuntojaan.
Juu, näin aluksi, mutta kun se alkuperäinenkään Harryn teksti ei ollut oikea versio tapahtumista. Ja tämän tämä kirjassa olevan tekstin lentohemmo pistää haamukirjoittajan syyksi. Vaikka Harry on ihan itse lukenut äänikirjan ja olis siten varmasti huomannut jos haamukirjoittaja olis kirjoittanut jotain potaskaa. Harry on hyväksynyt kirjan tekstin ja se on hänen versionsa tapahtuneesta. Lento-opettajalla on erilainen versio.
"felt that they were probably not Harry's words and highly likely to be dramatised due to the fact that the book was Ghost Written."
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Nyt on myös Harryn lennonopettajan sanoja väännelty. Hän on joutunut puolestaan korjaamaan asioita omalla facebook-seinällään. Julkinen postaus, Michael Booley.
I WANT THE TRUTH TO BE KNOWN. THIS POST IS PUBLIC, PLEASE SHARE MY COMMENTS FAR AND WIDE TO THE BELOW ARTICLE IN ORDER TO EXPOSE THE DELIBERATE DECEPTION BY THE PRESS !
I am Michael Booley, Harry's former Sgt Major flying instructor, quoted in this article. Out of the blue, I was contacted by the press to be made aware they were writing articles and as I was named in Harry's book "Spare" I was offered an opportunity to comment on it. I was completely unaware of this. As I had not seen it, I was then provided with an inaccurate version of the book (translated) and in response I expressed my concerns about any possible detrimental narratives from the outset. I later saw the English version and highlighted the differences to the press.
I was then assured that if I offered any comments, they would be reported on accurately. Stupidly and against my better judgement, I proceeded on trust. I made it absolutely clear that Harry was an exceptional student and I had nothing but the utmost respect for him. I highlighted some inaccuracies in the book, in particular reference to the flying sorties, but felt that they were probably not Harry's words and highly likely to be dramatised due to the fact that the book was Ghost Written. I did not know who the ghost writer was and certainly did not blame him. Not once did I say anything derogatory about Prince Harry and I certainly never said it was "complete fantasy" as the article headlines would have you believe. I made it clear to the reporters that I would not approve of anything derogatory and yet here we are. I also made it clear that I myself am suffering with complex PTSD and am under treatment for it and any misquotes or twists could potentially impact my health and well-being. I feel let down and betrayed by them. I also feel foolish for having listened to their assurances of trust and honesty. I should have know better. I certainly did not ask for or receive any payment, as some above comments suggest and am very despondent about how this article has been portrayed !
"Ei oo Harryn vika, jos on on väärää tietoa ja valheita, kyllä se on sen haamukirjottajan syy. Tahalleen tehty."
Just joo. 🙄
Eli et ymmärtänyt jutun pointtia. Booleylle annettiin lehden jostain kehittämä tarina Harryn kirjan tekstinä, johon Booley kommentoi aluksi. Kun hän sai käsiinsä aidon tekstin, hän tajusi tulleensa kusetuksi Mirrorin toimesta ja halusi korjata aiempia virheelliselle pohjalle antamiaan lausuntojaan.
Juu, näin aluksi, mutta kun se alkuperäinenkään Harryn teksti ei ollut oikea versio tapahtumista. Ja tämän tämä kirjassa olevan tekstin lentohemmo pistää haamukirjoittajan syyksi. Vaikka Harry on ihan itse lukenut äänikirjan ja olis siten varmasti huomannut jos haamukirjoittaja olis kirjoittanut jotain potaskaa. Harry on hyväksynyt kirjan tekstin ja se on hänen versionsa tapahtuneesta. Lento-opettajalla on erilainen versio.
"felt that they were probably not Harry's words and highly likely to be dramatised due to the fact that the book was Ghost Written."
Juuri tuota tarkoitin. Eli ymmärsin kyllä jutun pointin, kiitos vaan.
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Nyt on myös Harryn lennonopettajan sanoja väännelty. Hän on joutunut puolestaan korjaamaan asioita omalla facebook-seinällään. Julkinen postaus, Michael Booley.
I WANT THE TRUTH TO BE KNOWN. THIS POST IS PUBLIC, PLEASE SHARE MY COMMENTS FAR AND WIDE TO THE BELOW ARTICLE IN ORDER TO EXPOSE THE DELIBERATE DECEPTION BY THE PRESS !
I am Michael Booley, Harry's former Sgt Major flying instructor, quoted in this article. Out of the blue, I was contacted by the press to be made aware they were writing articles and as I was named in Harry's book "Spare" I was offered an opportunity to comment on it. I was completely unaware of this. As I had not seen it, I was then provided with an inaccurate version of the book (translated) and in response I expressed my concerns about any possible detrimental narratives from the outset. I later saw the English version and highlighted the differences to the press.
I was then assured that if I offered any comments, they would be reported on accurately. Stupidly and against my better judgement, I proceeded on trust. I made it absolutely clear that Harry was an exceptional student and I had nothing but the utmost respect for him. I highlighted some inaccuracies in the book, in particular reference to the flying sorties, but felt that they were probably not Harry's words and highly likely to be dramatised due to the fact that the book was Ghost Written. I did not know who the ghost writer was and certainly did not blame him. Not once did I say anything derogatory about Prince Harry and I certainly never said it was "complete fantasy" as the article headlines would have you believe. I made it clear to the reporters that I would not approve of anything derogatory and yet here we are. I also made it clear that I myself am suffering with complex PTSD and am under treatment for it and any misquotes or twists could potentially impact my health and well-being. I feel let down and betrayed by them. I also feel foolish for having listened to their assurances of trust and honesty. I should have know better. I certainly did not ask for or receive any payment, as some above comments suggest and am very despondent about how this article has been portrayed !
"Ei oo Harryn vika, jos on on väärää tietoa ja valheita, kyllä se on sen haamukirjottajan syy. Tahalleen tehty."
Just joo. 🙄
Eli et ymmärtänyt jutun pointtia. Booleylle annettiin lehden jostain kehittämä tarina Harryn kirjan tekstinä, johon Booley kommentoi aluksi. Kun hän sai käsiinsä aidon tekstin, hän tajusi tulleensa kusetuksi Mirrorin toimesta ja halusi korjata aiempia virheelliselle pohjalle antamiaan lausuntojaan.
Ei lehti mitään "jostain kehittänyt", Harryn sanoja ne olivat. Itse vielä äänikirjassaan sen tekstin lukee.
Kaikenlaisia kaheleita. Huomaa, että PTSD on, kuten hemmo itse mainitsee.
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Harold nimi tulee Nickelodeonin sarjasta joka julkaistiin 96. 🧐
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Nyt on myös Harryn lennonopettajan sanoja väännelty. Hän on joutunut puolestaan korjaamaan asioita omalla facebook-seinällään. Julkinen postaus, Michael Booley.
I WANT THE TRUTH TO BE KNOWN. THIS POST IS PUBLIC, PLEASE SHARE MY COMMENTS FAR AND WIDE TO THE BELOW ARTICLE IN ORDER TO EXPOSE THE DELIBERATE DECEPTION BY THE PRESS !
I am Michael Booley, Harry's former Sgt Major flying instructor, quoted in this article. Out of the blue, I was contacted by the press to be made aware they were writing articles and as I was named in Harry's book "Spare" I was offered an opportunity to comment on it. I was completely unaware of this. As I had not seen it, I was then provided with an inaccurate version of the book (translated) and in response I expressed my concerns about any possible detrimental narratives from the outset. I later saw the English version and highlighted the differences to the press.
I was then assured that if I offered any comments, they would be reported on accurately. Stupidly and against my better judgement, I proceeded on trust. I made it absolutely clear that Harry was an exceptional student and I had nothing but the utmost respect for him. I highlighted some inaccuracies in the book, in particular reference to the flying sorties, but felt that they were probably not Harry's words and highly likely to be dramatised due to the fact that the book was Ghost Written. I did not know who the ghost writer was and certainly did not blame him. Not once did I say anything derogatory about Prince Harry and I certainly never said it was "complete fantasy" as the article headlines would have you believe. I made it clear to the reporters that I would not approve of anything derogatory and yet here we are. I also made it clear that I myself am suffering with complex PTSD and am under treatment for it and any misquotes or twists could potentially impact my health and well-being. I feel let down and betrayed by them. I also feel foolish for having listened to their assurances of trust and honesty. I should have know better. I certainly did not ask for or receive any payment, as some above comments suggest and am very despondent about how this article has been portrayed !
"Ei oo Harryn vika, jos on on väärää tietoa ja valheita, kyllä se on sen haamukirjottajan syy. Tahalleen tehty."
Just joo. 🙄
Harry luki itse kirjan äänikirjaksi. Ei älynnyt korjata tekstiä?
Oletko sinä kuunnellut Harryn lukeman kirjan? Taidat vaan toistella muiden mielipiteitä.
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Harold nimi tulee Nickelodeonin sarjasta joka julkaistiin 96. 🧐
???????
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Harold nimi tulee Nickelodeonin sarjasta joka julkaistiin 96. 🧐
???????
William oli oikeasti Willie.
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Harold nimi tulee Nickelodeonin sarjasta joka julkaistiin 96. 🧐
???????
William oli oikeasti Willie.
He reportedly calls her "Babykins", he is apparently her "Big Willie" and they long for a family of their own.
https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/celebrity/how-big-willie-won-over-…
Armeijassa se lyheni Big Willy.
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Nyt on myös Harryn lennonopettajan sanoja väännelty. Hän on joutunut puolestaan korjaamaan asioita omalla facebook-seinällään. Julkinen postaus, Michael Booley.
I WANT THE TRUTH TO BE KNOWN. THIS POST IS PUBLIC, PLEASE SHARE MY COMMENTS FAR AND WIDE TO THE BELOW ARTICLE IN ORDER TO EXPOSE THE DELIBERATE DECEPTION BY THE PRESS !
I am Michael Booley, Harry's former Sgt Major flying instructor, quoted in this article. Out of the blue, I was contacted by the press to be made aware they were writing articles and as I was named in Harry's book "Spare" I was offered an opportunity to comment on it. I was completely unaware of this. As I had not seen it, I was then provided with an inaccurate version of the book (translated) and in response I expressed my concerns about any possible detrimental narratives from the outset. I later saw the English version and highlighted the differences to the press.
I was then assured that if I offered any comments, they would be reported on accurately. Stupidly and against my better judgement, I proceeded on trust. I made it absolutely clear that Harry was an exceptional student and I had nothing but the utmost respect for him. I highlighted some inaccuracies in the book, in particular reference to the flying sorties, but felt that they were probably not Harry's words and highly likely to be dramatised due to the fact that the book was Ghost Written. I did not know who the ghost writer was and certainly did not blame him. Not once did I say anything derogatory about Prince Harry and I certainly never said it was "complete fantasy" as the article headlines would have you believe. I made it clear to the reporters that I would not approve of anything derogatory and yet here we are. I also made it clear that I myself am suffering with complex PTSD and am under treatment for it and any misquotes or twists could potentially impact my health and well-being. I feel let down and betrayed by them. I also feel foolish for having listened to their assurances of trust and honesty. I should have know better. I certainly did not ask for or receive any payment, as some above comments suggest and am very despondent about how this article has been portrayed !
"Ei oo Harryn vika, jos on on väärää tietoa ja valheita, kyllä se on sen haamukirjottajan syy. Tahalleen tehty."
Just joo. 🙄
Harry luki itse kirjan äänikirjaksi. Ei älynnyt korjata tekstiä?
Oletko sinä kuunnellut Harryn lukeman kirjan? Taidat vaan toistella muiden mielipiteitä.
Ilmeisesti sinä sitten olet kuunnellut? Kerro, miten se kohta siellä oikeasti kuului!
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Avioliiton pilaajat taustalla.
https://www.gettyimages.co.nz/detail/news-photo/diana-princess-of-wales…
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Nyt on myös Harryn lennonopettajan sanoja väännelty. Hän on joutunut puolestaan korjaamaan asioita omalla facebook-seinällään. Julkinen postaus, Michael Booley.
I WANT THE TRUTH TO BE KNOWN. THIS POST IS PUBLIC, PLEASE SHARE MY COMMENTS FAR AND WIDE TO THE BELOW ARTICLE IN ORDER TO EXPOSE THE DELIBERATE DECEPTION BY THE PRESS !
I am Michael Booley, Harry's former Sgt Major flying instructor, quoted in this article. Out of the blue, I was contacted by the press to be made aware they were writing articles and as I was named in Harry's book "Spare" I was offered an opportunity to comment on it. I was completely unaware of this. As I had not seen it, I was then provided with an inaccurate version of the book (translated) and in response I expressed my concerns about any possible detrimental narratives from the outset. I later saw the English version and highlighted the differences to the press.
I was then assured that if I offered any comments, they would be reported on accurately. Stupidly and against my better judgement, I proceeded on trust. I made it absolutely clear that Harry was an exceptional student and I had nothing but the utmost respect for him. I highlighted some inaccuracies in the book, in particular reference to the flying sorties, but felt that they were probably not Harry's words and highly likely to be dramatised due to the fact that the book was Ghost Written. I did not know who the ghost writer was and certainly did not blame him. Not once did I say anything derogatory about Prince Harry and I certainly never said it was "complete fantasy" as the article headlines would have you believe. I made it clear to the reporters that I would not approve of anything derogatory and yet here we are. I also made it clear that I myself am suffering with complex PTSD and am under treatment for it and any misquotes or twists could potentially impact my health and well-being. I feel let down and betrayed by them. I also feel foolish for having listened to their assurances of trust and honesty. I should have know better. I certainly did not ask for or receive any payment, as some above comments suggest and am very despondent about how this article has been portrayed !
"Ei oo Harryn vika, jos on on väärää tietoa ja valheita, kyllä se on sen haamukirjottajan syy. Tahalleen tehty."
Just joo. 🙄
Harry luki itse kirjan äänikirjaksi. Ei älynnyt korjata tekstiä?
Oletko sinä kuunnellut Harryn lukeman kirjan? Taidat vaan toistella muiden mielipiteitä.
Kirjahan on netissä ollut ilmaiseksi kuunneltavissa jo kolmatta viikkoa.
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Harold nimi tulee Nickelodeonin sarjasta joka julkaistiin 96. 🧐
Who's Harold?
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Harold nimi tulee Nickelodeonin sarjasta joka julkaistiin 96. 🧐
Who's Harold?
Hey Arnold!
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Harold nimi tulee Nickelodeonin sarjasta joka julkaistiin 96. 🧐
Who's Harold?
Harold on Henryn lempinimi.
Ajalta ennen kuin Henrystä tuli H.
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Harold nimi tulee Nickelodeonin sarjasta joka julkaistiin 96. 🧐
Who's Harold?
Harold on Henryn lempinimi.
Ajalta ennen kuin Henrystä tuli H.
Aha. Sä voit kutsua Harrya vaikka Joonataniksi, jos siltä tuntuu.
Prinssi Harrya on aina kutsuttu Harryksi.
Prince Harry was born in 1984, the second child of the Prince and Princess of Wales
Born at St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, on 15 September 1984, the prince was christened Henry Charles Albert David by the Archbishop of Canterbury in December of that year in St George's Chapel, Windsor.
But it was officially announced from the start of his life that he would be known as Harry.
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Harold nimi tulee Nickelodeonin sarjasta joka julkaistiin 96. 🧐
Who's Harold?
Harold on Henryn lempinimi.
Ajalta ennen kuin Henrystä tuli H.
Aha. Sä voit kutsua Harrya vaikka Joonataniksi, jos siltä tuntuu.
Prinssi Harrya on aina kutsuttu Harryksi.
Prince Harry was born in 1984, the second child of the Prince and Princess of Wales
Born at St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, on 15 September 1984, the prince was christened Henry Charles Albert David by the Archbishop of Canterbury in December of that year in St George's Chapel, Windsor.
But it was officially announced from the start of his life that he would be known as Harry.
Saksalaisesta Battenberg nimesta kaannettiin Mountbatten englanniksi kun saksalaiset eivat ole olleet kovin rakastettuja UK:ssa.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Battenberg-family
Nyt ollaan sitten niin His Royal Highnesseja sukkahoususaantoineen vaikka koko firma on uudisasukkaita.
Meghan on edelleen piilossa. Erikoista.
Ketju on lukittu.
Eli et ymmärtänyt jutun pointtia. Booleylle annettiin lehden jostain kehittämä tarina Harryn kirjan tekstinä, johon Booley kommentoi aluksi. Kun hän sai käsiinsä aidon tekstin, hän tajusi tulleensa kusetuksi Mirrorin toimesta ja halusi korjata aiempia virheelliselle pohjalle antamiaan lausuntojaan.