Lue keskustelun säännöt.
En usko että kuussa on käyty!
25.07.2015 |
Jumaliste. Miksei siitä laskeutumispaikasta saada otettua valokuvaa? Plutostakin saadaan valokuvia mutta ei kuun pinnasta.
Luulisi olevan helppo tehtävä kun on luotaimia ja kaukoputkia.
Niin?
Kommentit (155)
Onhan niitä laskeutumisalueita kuvattu Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiterilla (LRO). Ihan hyviä kuvia on tullut. Googlettakaa itse, en nyt jaksa teidän puolesta. LRO apollo landing site images googleen tai jotain vastaavaa.
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
[quote author="Vierailija" time="25.07.2015 klo 00:44"]
En minäkään usko. Miksei siellä sitten olla käyty enää tuon ensimmäisen kerran jälkeen? Luulisi, että se olisi nyt myöhemmin todella helppoa, jos 46 vuotta sittenkin oli jo moiset tekniikat.
[/quote] Mita hyotya olisi siella enaa kayda ja mista ne rahat otettaisiin? Suomalaisten taskusta? Ihan vapaastihan sinne saa menna, amerikkalaisia ja venalaisia ei enaa kiinnosta kun on kerran jo nahty.
Kuu kuvattuna maasta. ISS kuun ja maan välissä.
https://twitter.com/StationCDRKelly/status/627237854889050113
"Lähikuvia" Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter-luotaimen ottamana.
http://www.space.com/12030-moon-photos-nasa-lunar-reconnaissance-orbiter.html
Onpa tosi lähikuvia, naurettavaa. Pitäisi näkyä selkästi Amerikan lippu, jalanjäljet jne. Jos kerran Maasta saadaan otettua noinkin tarkka kuva kuusta, niin pitäisi kuuluotaimen avulla tulla tarkempia kuvia!
Plus tuossa kuvagalleriassa on tarkkoja kuvia joukossa jostain kraatereista, mutta nuo "lähikuvat" Apollo 11-sälästä ovat kaikki epätarkkoja ja epämääräisiä.
[quote author="Vierailija" time="03.08.2015 klo 15:17"]
A live TV broadcast from the moon is not possible and is a big lie
The live TV broadcast "from the moon" to the Earth is not possible. Big TV cameras of the TV studios of the 1960ies with their transmission antennas and with the current supply for the camera equipment are not available on the moon. The weight of a big TV camera of the 1960s current supply device inclusive was about 80 kg and was absolutely not transportable. On the moon there never had been any electricity for this joke.
The antenna for a live TV broadcast had been not so big on the moon (about as big as an opened umbrella). But the receiving antenna on the Earth should be very big and had to be very quick to handle because of the Earth rotation, or it had to be planted on the North or on the South pole for staying always on the same place. If the receiving antenna is on the shadow side of the moon there is no radio communication
When there would be a radio communication over the "mother ship" which is in an orbit around the moon during the "moon landing" the problem becomes even bigger because the "mother ship" is circulation around the moon and is also on the shadow side of the Earth for half of the time. By these circumstances life TV broadcast are hardly possible.
And it's strange that there is not one single "moon foto" showing a "moon astronaut" making films with a big TV camera.
And how should be hold a radio communication over a distance of 380,000 km? A satellite has today about 300 km maximum distance from the Earth. When we admit 500 km maximum and would reinforce the radio signal from the moon to the Earth with satellites we would need a chain of 760 satellites to transmit the radio signal. Add to this the Earth is turning and all satellites would have to turn corresponding to the Earth's turn. So a radio communication from the moon to the Earth is not possible at all.
By all these factors there is the conclusion that there has never been one single human on the moon until now who was handling a video camera there or has made a film there, and it's sure that never had been performed a live TV broadcast from the moon. All "moon films", the little films from the video camera on the Lunar Module inclusive (which has never flown but was hanging on the rope), are a big lie...
(from: Wisnewski: Lies in Space)
http://www.hist-chron.com/atmosphaerenfahrt/24_moon-films-radio-transmissions-aliens-fake-ENGL.html
[/quote]
Ai viisisataa kilometriä kantaa satelliitit radiosignaalia tänä päivänä? Puolen Suomen matkaa? Tuo on kyllä täyttä paskaa. Radiosingnaali menee kuuhun helposti.
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Olen samaa mieltä. Kuussa ei ole käyty, aurinko kiertää maata niin kuin kuukin (senhän näkee omilla silmillään) ja maapallo on litteä pannukakku. Kävin Azoreilla ja siellä näkyi, kuinka lännessä oli reuna joka katosi eli siellä oli se pannukakun reuna.
Astronaut David Scott of Apollo 15 is said having let fallen down a hammer and a feather to prove that in the vacuum of the moon both falls at the same speed. But the film is blurred in a kind that nobody can recognize what is falling on the picture (Wisnewski, p.230).
Look the video with a radio communication (in English) without any time delay of 2.4 seconds
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Just eilen kävin keikan kuussa. Paskansin sen pisteen miljardisosan. Kaiva teleskooppis hölmö.
Missä kuuauton renkaanjäljet?? Onko se auto tiputettu siihen paikalleen nosturilla?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apollo15LunarRover2.jpg
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
[quote author="Vierailija" time="03.08.2015 klo 19:47"]
[quote author="Vierailija" time="03.08.2015 klo 19:17"]
[quote author="Vierailija" time="03.08.2015 klo 15:17"]
A live TV broadcast from the moon is not possible and is a big lie
The live TV broadcast "from the moon" to the Earth is not possible. Big TV cameras of the TV studios of the 1960ies with their transmission antennas and with the current supply for the camera equipment are not available on the moon. The weight of a big TV camera of the 1960s current supply device inclusive was about 80 kg and was absolutely not transportable. On the moon there never had been any electricity for this joke.
The antenna for a live TV broadcast had been not so big on the moon (about as big as an opened umbrella). But the receiving antenna on the Earth should be very big and had to be very quick to handle because of the Earth rotation, or it had to be planted on the North or on the South pole for staying always on the same place. If the receiving antenna is on the shadow side of the moon there is no radio communication
When there would be a radio communication over the "mother ship" which is in an orbit around the moon during the "moon landing" the problem becomes even bigger because the "mother ship" is circulation around the moon and is also on the shadow side of the Earth for half of the time. By these circumstances life TV broadcast are hardly possible.
And it's strange that there is not one single "moon foto" showing a "moon astronaut" making films with a big TV camera.
And how should be hold a radio communication over a distance of 380,000 km? A satellite has today about 300 km maximum distance from the Earth. When we admit 500 km maximum and would reinforce the radio signal from the moon to the Earth with satellites we would need a chain of 760 satellites to transmit the radio signal. Add to this the Earth is turning and all satellites would have to turn corresponding to the Earth's turn. So a radio communication from the moon to the Earth is not possible at all.
By all these factors there is the conclusion that there has never been one single human on the moon until now who was handling a video camera there or has made a film there, and it's sure that never had been performed a live TV broadcast from the moon. All "moon films", the little films from the video camera on the Lunar Module inclusive (which has never flown but was hanging on the rope), are a big lie...
(from: Wisnewski: Lies in Space)
http://www.hist-chron.com/atmosphaerenfahrt/24_moon-films-radio-transmissions-aliens-fake-ENGL.html
[/quote]
Ai viisisataa kilometriä kantaa satelliitit radiosignaalia tänä päivänä? Puolen Suomen matkaa? Tuo on kyllä täyttä paskaa. Radiosingnaali menee kuuhun helposti.
[/quote]
No eipä se kännykänkään singnaali lennä ilman halki jos soitat amerikkaan. Siinä on välissä vitun monta mastoa. Ei tarvitse kuin olal tiheässä metsässä niin kentät häviää. Ajatelkaa miten paljon ne häviää 300tuhannen kilometrin matkalla kun muistetaan, että avaruus on täynnä kaikenlaista säteilyä. Kuulennot on studiokamaa, josta tiesi vain muutama ihminen. Kyllä mäkin voin väittää vaikka mitä kun tarpeeksi rahaa annetaan.
[/quote]
Mitä vittua? Radiosignaali kulkee tyhjiössä valonnopeudella, eli sekunnissa se menee kuuhun ilman väliainetta...
[quote author="Vierailija" time="03.08.2015 klo 19:30"]
Missä kuuauton renkaanjäljet?? Onko se auto tiputettu siihen paikalleen nosturilla?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apollo15LunarRover2.jpg
[/quote] Eiks kukaan tiedä?
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
[quote author="Vierailija" time="03.08.2015 klo 19:17"]
[quote author="Vierailija" time="03.08.2015 klo 15:17"]
A live TV broadcast from the moon is not possible and is a big lie
The live TV broadcast "from the moon" to the Earth is not possible. Big TV cameras of the TV studios of the 1960ies with their transmission antennas and with the current supply for the camera equipment are not available on the moon. The weight of a big TV camera of the 1960s current supply device inclusive was about 80 kg and was absolutely not transportable. On the moon there never had been any electricity for this joke.
The antenna for a live TV broadcast had been not so big on the moon (about as big as an opened umbrella). But the receiving antenna on the Earth should be very big and had to be very quick to handle because of the Earth rotation, or it had to be planted on the North or on the South pole for staying always on the same place. If the receiving antenna is on the shadow side of the moon there is no radio communication
When there would be a radio communication over the "mother ship" which is in an orbit around the moon during the "moon landing" the problem becomes even bigger because the "mother ship" is circulation around the moon and is also on the shadow side of the Earth for half of the time. By these circumstances life TV broadcast are hardly possible.
And it's strange that there is not one single "moon foto" showing a "moon astronaut" making films with a big TV camera.
And how should be hold a radio communication over a distance of 380,000 km? A satellite has today about 300 km maximum distance from the Earth. When we admit 500 km maximum and would reinforce the radio signal from the moon to the Earth with satellites we would need a chain of 760 satellites to transmit the radio signal. Add to this the Earth is turning and all satellites would have to turn corresponding to the Earth's turn. So a radio communication from the moon to the Earth is not possible at all.
By all these factors there is the conclusion that there has never been one single human on the moon until now who was handling a video camera there or has made a film there, and it's sure that never had been performed a live TV broadcast from the moon. All "moon films", the little films from the video camera on the Lunar Module inclusive (which has never flown but was hanging on the rope), are a big lie...
(from: Wisnewski: Lies in Space)
http://www.hist-chron.com/atmosphaerenfahrt/24_moon-films-radio-transmissions-aliens-fake-ENGL.html
[/quote]
Ai viisisataa kilometriä kantaa satelliitit radiosignaalia tänä päivänä? Puolen Suomen matkaa? Tuo on kyllä täyttä paskaa. Radiosingnaali menee kuuhun helposti.
[/quote]
No eipä se kännykänkään singnaali lennä ilman halki jos soitat amerikkaan. Siinä on välissä vitun monta mastoa. Ei tarvitse kuin olal tiheässä metsässä niin kentät häviää. Ajatelkaa miten paljon ne häviää 300tuhannen kilometrin matkalla kun muistetaan, että avaruus on täynnä kaikenlaista säteilyä. Kuulennot on studiokamaa, josta tiesi vain muutama ihminen. Kyllä mäkin voin väittää vaikka mitä kun tarpeeksi rahaa annetaan.
Jos kuussa on käyty, miksi "kuukivet" osoittautuvat kaikki väärennöksiksi?
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
En minäkään usko. Miksei siellä sitten olla käyty enää tuon ensimmäisen kerran jälkeen? Luulisi, että se olisi nyt myöhemmin todella helppoa, jos 46 vuotta sittenkin oli jo moiset tekniikat.