Lue keskustelun säännöt.
MPR ja Wakefield
10.01.2011 |
Wakefield ratkaisu oli poliittinen
Northern Echo -lehdessä haastatellun Paul Shattockin mukaan Britanniassa MPR-rokotteen ja autismin mahdollisen yhteyden selvittämisen puolesta toimineen Andrew Wakefieldin ja muiden tutkimusryhmän jäsenten saama langettava ratkaisu oli poliittinen. Shattockin mukaan Wakefieldin ja ryhmän toimista eivät ole valittaneet potilaat. Artikkelia on kommentoitu niin, että valituksen on tehnyt News Corporationille työskentelevä toimittaja Brian Deer. New Corporation pääjohtaja - jolle Brian Deer Shattockin mukaan viime kädessä työskentelee - on kommentin mukaan James Murdoch, joka on myös rokotevalmistaja GlaxoSmithKlinen hallituksessa vastuualueenaan ulkoiset asiat jotka voivat vakavasti vaikuttaa yhtiön liiketoimintaan ja maineeseen.
http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/4889878.Autism_link_with_MMR_jab_…
Kommentit (14)
JULIA WON HER LAWSUIT WITH THE VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATION PROGRAM! THE GOVERNMENT CONCEDED! This means that they agreed that the MMR vaccine caused her encephalitis and resultant brain damage (I mean Marvelous Mind - right Howard!!). This is such a huge, huge, huge help for Julia and my family. The government will reimburse all of her past medical expenses (to her, not to us, which I find a little odd, but OK!) and will pay for all future medical expenses that she incurs from her vaccine injury. I will update as I find out more. Her attorney (Ron Homer and/or Kevin Conway) will be flying out here this summer to evaluate her and her needs with a "life planner" to try to determine what her needs will be. This is HUGE! HUGE! The VICP rarely concedes.....almost never......but they did for her! AMAZING!
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
mustamaalata ja hiljentää Wakefield hallituksen suojelemiseksi Pluserix -MPR-rokoteskandaalilta. Edelleen Timesin mukaan GMC puolestaan katsoi, että se, että Wakefield ei myönnä väärinkäytöksiään, on sinänsä jo hyvä peruste lääkärinoikeuksien elinikäiseksi poistamiseksi.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article7135099.ece
Statement from Andrew Wakefield
Sunday, May 23rd, 2010
Today, the GMC will issue their verdict in the case against Drs Andrew Walkefield, Simon Murch and John Walker-Smith. Dr Wakefield has issued the following statement:
Why the vaccine lobby had to silence me
A Statement from Dr Andrew Wakefield MB,BS., FRCS., FRCPath
The General Medical Council versus Dr Wakefield, Professor Walker-Smith, and Professor Murch.
In a further effort to silence my concerns over vaccine safety, the UK’s General Medical Council [GMC] will erase me
from the UK’s Medical Register on Monday May 24. My colleagues face the possibility of similar sanctions.
In reporting their findings the GMC panel sought to deny that the case against me and my colleagues is related to issues
of MMR vaccine safety and specifically, the role of this vaccine in causing autism. This is not in fact the case. Efforts to
discredit and silence me through the GMC process have provided a screen to shield the government from exposure on
the Pluserix MMR vaccine scandal.
Early in the course of the proceedings, GMC officials removed the appointed chairman Dr Kumar, a general practitioner
from Merseyside. They appointed instead Professor Angus McDevitt from Dundee who had serious conflicts of interest
in his role in the Pluserix MMR vaccine scandal. McDevitt was chosen even though he could not be considered an
impartial, independent or objective GMC panel chairman.
Pluserix MMR was introduced to the UK in October 1988 even though exactly the same vaccine supplied as “Trivirix”
had already been withdrawn as unsafe from Canada in November 1987. It was later also withdrawn from the UK on
seven days notice in September 1992 by Smith Kline Pharmaceuticals acting on legal advice. It was unsafe and caused
high levels of adverse reactions in children.
It has emerged through a government whistleblower and secret documents that the government, knowing of the
vaccine’s risks, protected the vaccine manufacturers from liability for damage. Pluserix MMR was rushed through the
licensing process without adequate safety testing. It appears to be the government that is now liable for compensation
claims from parents of Pluserix-damaged children. Freedom of Information documents confirm the first claims for legal
aid were being made by parents as early as 1991, seven years before I published in The Lancet and raised public
concerns about harm to children.
This matter, which sparked the real MMR scare in the UK – in contrast with my response to parental fears – must be
forced out into the open through a public inquiry
In 1988, McDevitt was part of a committee – the Committee on Adverse Reactions to Vaccination and Immunisation
(ARVI). It was responsible for assessing the safety of MMR prior to its introduction in the UK. The ARVI committee
failed to adequately heed warnings from Canada about the dangers of the Pluserix MMR vaccine.
McDevitt took part in ARVI meetings that discussed warnings about the dangerous Trivirix MMR vaccine, made by
Smith Kline Beecham, that was withdrawn in Canada for causing meningitis. At the same time, exactly the same
vaccine was rebranded as Pluserix and licensed in the UK. The vaccine then had to be withdrawn in a dramatic volte
face four years later when the rate of MMR-associated meningitis was found to be far higher than previously claimed.
The full extent of other serious adverse reactions is not known publicly although attempts were made to ascertain this
by Jack Ashley MP in 1992.
McDevitt was specifically brought in by the GMC to replace Kumar because of his vaccine expertise. When challenged
on McDevitt’s appointment by my lawyers, the GMC initially resisted removing him from the panel despite the fact that
he had not disclosed his obvious conflict of interest. McDevitt has also received research grants from a large number of
drug companies including manufacturers of the MMR vaccine.
Media inquiries caused the GMC sufficient embarrassment that they were forced to remove McDevitt, and re-insert
Kumar. Kumar also had undisclosed conflicts, sitting on two medicine licensing authority committees and owning
shares in GSK, manufacturers of Pluserix. Their current denial that the issue has anything to do with MMR vaccine
safety, should be viewed in the light of these facts.
kuinka monen lääketieteen asiantuntijan toimesta. On tehty vastaavia tutkimuksia useita jne.
Kaikki osoittavat sen että huijari on huijari.
Wakefield halusi markkinoille toisen rokotteen, johon hänellä itsellään on patenttioikeus.
Kyllähän se koville ottaa, kun on vuosia myötäillyt huijaria. Ymmärrän kyllä. Oletkohan homeopatiakauppias? Onko myynti hiipunut?
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
kuinka monen lääketieteen asiantuntijan toimesta. On tehty vastaavia tutkimuksia useita jne.
Kaikki osoittavat sen että huijari on huijari.
Wakefield halusi markkinoille toisen rokotteen, johon hänellä itsellään on patenttioikeus.Kyllähän se koville ottaa, kun on vuosia myötäillyt huijaria. Ymmärrän kyllä. Oletkohan homeopatiakauppias? Onko myynti hiipunut?
sehän on selvä, kun asiaa vähän tutkii. Suosittelen samaa sinulle.
This weekend Julie Gerberding, the head of the CDC, appeared on Dr. Sanjay Gupta's show, House Call, and explained that vaccines can trigger autism in a vulnerable subset of children. This is the claim that parents like me have been making since at least the 80's, and have been dismissed and even mocked for making it.
But no one in the main stream media seems to have noticed. Not even CNN. Not even Dr. Gupta who was sitting right in front of her.
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
useammat kansainväliset Journal of Medicines ja muut vastaavat ovat artikkeleissaan/tutkimuksissaan todenneet Wakefieldin huijariksi ja peittäneen tutkimustuloksiaan (kuten esim. että autismin oireet ovat alkaneet tutkituilla esiintyä jo ennen rokotuksia) niin toivoisin laajakatseisuutta myös toiseen suuntaan...
* Consider delaying vaccines until your child is 18-24 months old.
* Do not vaccinate if your child is taking antibiotics.
* Consider no more than one vaccine per doctor’s visit.
* If you plan to get the MMR vaccine, ask your doctor to give it in three separate vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella.
* Consider giving high doses of Vitamin C (3,000-5,000 mg per day) on the day before, of, and after vaccination.
* If your child experiences any developmental delays, stop vaccinating until you learn more.
* With the measles vaccine (MMR), consider high doses of Vitamin A (5,000 IU or more) on the day before, of, and after vaccination.
* If your child has an adverse reaction to a vaccine, stop vaccinating until you learn more.
* Always ask to see the vaccine insert, and never accept a vaccine that uses the preservative Thimerosal (mercury). For a complete list of vaccines with Thimerosal, see the FDA’s website here. Note: most flu shots today still contain Thimerosal.
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
useammat kansainväliset Journal of Medicines ja muut vastaavat ovat artikkeleissaan/tutkimuksissaan todenneet Wakefieldin huijariksi ja peittäneen tutkimustuloksiaan (kuten esim. että autismin oireet ovat alkaneet tutkituilla esiintyä jo ennen rokotuksia) niin toivoisin laajakatseisuutta myös toiseen suuntaan...
Väännetään mustaa valkoiseksi vaikka mikä olisi. Ja kamalia salaliitto-teorioita nähdään joka paikassa :D
http://juliagrimesjourney.blogspot.com/2009/06/amazing-day-miracle-has-…