Lue keskustelun säännöt.
Tervetuloa lukemaan keskusteluja! Kommentointi on avoinna klo 7 - 23.
Tervetuloa lukemaan keskusteluja! Kommentointi on avoinna klo 7 - 23.
Alue: Aihe vapaa
Prinssi William alkanut ärsyttämään.
09.05.2023 |
Minusta on tosi kylmää, että yksi perheenjäsen ajetaan koko perheestä ulos, kun ei halua edustaa monarkiaa ja on kritisoinut sitä ääneen. Hän on kumminkin Williamin veli. Diana olisi surullinen tästä, mutta onneksi Willian vannoo uskollisuuttaan Charlesille.
Kommentit (2003)
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Are the British Royal family a bunch of narcissists?
Living under a glass dome, cushioned by privilege, and surrounded by sycophants, or even just servants who are simply striving to do a good job, is not emotionally healthy for anyone. Character develops with the knowledge of a job well done, and with resisting temptation, and with standing against adversity. The royals seldom get the opportunity to be refined in the crucible, and some of that is not their fault. It is the responsibility of a nation to not indulge the weaknesses of a king, as the biblical stories of Saul, David, and Solomon remind us.
Even a person of strong character and outstanding integrity would soon get the message that they are better than the average pedestrian. The royals receive that message every day. You only have to read some of the posts here on Quora to see that there are people who will not hear a word spoken against the British Royals. They prefer to blame Diana for her own heartbreak, and a trafficked young woman for her own rape, and a black American divorced actress for her marginalisation.
Protecting anyone from the outcomes of their own self serving folly does not do such people good. They begin to believe in their own untouchable superiority.
The British royal family talk of service, and I have no doubt that they do perform services such as attending endless irrelevant openings wielding a freshly plated silver knife to cut the cake, or newly purchased silver scissors to cut the ribbon. They deliver a speech about world peace and carbon emissions, then climb back into an antique carriage drawn by horses and escorted by the military, to return to their castle where they are waited upon by staff, by which we mean servants.
Charles cries if his egg isnt cooked to precision. Andrew cries if a maid accidentally rearranges his teddies. Anne is admired for her rudeness. In her case, we extol her abruptness as good sense. We curtesy to a jolly horsewoman (now the Queen consort) who watched her friend cry because they were both sleeping with the Prince of Wales. Only one of them was his wife. It wasnt the jolly horsewoman.
TOXIC is a very strong word. Im not convinced that specific members of the British royal are toxic, so much as that they are surrounded by toxicity.
They grey suits in particular are reputed to be petty, spiteful, and cruel. The royals dont stand up to them, because no one wants to have a mismanaged diary. Dont forget those irrelevant flower show openings.
NARCISSUS is another very strong word. Im not convinced that the royal family are all narcissist, so much as they are surrounded by the opportunity to be so. I think that it takes a particular flaw in the character, coupled with the willingness to lie, and an inflated ego to create a narcissist. Not everyone has all three qualities.
The British Royal Family are a family of people with stunted emotional growth and an unbalanced sense of privilege.
Ei sairaalloinen narsismi synny tuolla tavoin. Narsismia on varmastikin jokaisessa ihmisessä jkv, mutta sairaalloinen narsismi ei kehity vain syntymällä etuoikeutettuun perheeseen. Toki he varmasti käyttäytyvät tiedostaen oikein hyvin asemansa, mutta se ei ole samaa kuin narsismi, ihan kuin tuossakin kirjoitetaan. Sen sijaan Meghanissa näen narsismin aidoimmillaan, oikein tyyppiesimerkillisesti.
Tietysti näet mitä tahdot. Mikä Meghanin lapsuudessa muka selittää pers.häiriön kehittymisen? Paljon epänormaalimpi ja traumaattisempi lapsuus harrylla ja willsillä on ollut.
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Are the British Royal family a bunch of narcissists?
Living under a glass dome, cushioned by privilege, and surrounded by sycophants, or even just servants who are simply striving to do a good job, is not emotionally healthy for anyone. Character develops with the knowledge of a job well done, and with resisting temptation, and with standing against adversity. The royals seldom get the opportunity to be refined in the crucible, and some of that is not their fault. It is the responsibility of a nation to not indulge the weaknesses of a king, as the biblical stories of Saul, David, and Solomon remind us.
Even a person of strong character and outstanding integrity would soon get the message that they are better than the average pedestrian. The royals receive that message every day. You only have to read some of the posts here on Quora to see that there are people who will not hear a word spoken against the British Royals. They prefer to blame Diana for her own heartbreak, and a trafficked young woman for her own rape, and a black American divorced actress for her marginalisation.
Protecting anyone from the outcomes of their own self serving folly does not do such people good. They begin to believe in their own untouchable superiority.
The British royal family talk of service, and I have no doubt that they do perform services such as attending endless irrelevant openings wielding a freshly plated silver knife to cut the cake, or newly purchased silver scissors to cut the ribbon. They deliver a speech about world peace and carbon emissions, then climb back into an antique carriage drawn by horses and escorted by the military, to return to their castle where they are waited upon by staff, by which we mean servants.
Charles cries if his egg isnt cooked to precision. Andrew cries if a maid accidentally rearranges his teddies. Anne is admired for her rudeness. In her case, we extol her abruptness as good sense. We curtesy to a jolly horsewoman (now the Queen consort) who watched her friend cry because they were both sleeping with the Prince of Wales. Only one of them was his wife. It wasnt the jolly horsewoman.
TOXIC is a very strong word. Im not convinced that specific members of the British royal are toxic, so much as that they are surrounded by toxicity.
They grey suits in particular are reputed to be petty, spiteful, and cruel. The royals dont stand up to them, because no one wants to have a mismanaged diary. Dont forget those irrelevant flower show openings.
NARCISSUS is another very strong word. Im not convinced that the royal family are all narcissist, so much as they are surrounded by the opportunity to be so. I think that it takes a particular flaw in the character, coupled with the willingness to lie, and an inflated ego to create a narcissist. Not everyone has all three qualities.
The British Royal Family are a family of people with stunted emotional growth and an unbalanced sense of privilege.
Ei sairaalloinen narsismi synny tuolla tavoin. Narsismia on varmastikin jokaisessa ihmisessä jkv, mutta sairaalloinen narsismi ei kehity vain syntymällä etuoikeutettuun perheeseen. Toki he varmasti käyttäytyvät tiedostaen oikein hyvin asemansa, mutta se ei ole samaa kuin narsismi, ihan kuin tuossakin kirjoitetaan. Sen sijaan Meghanissa näen narsismin aidoimmillaan, oikein tyyppiesimerkillisesti.
Painu narsistihullu nyt v i t t u u n jankuttamasta narsisteista. Terapiaan ja osastolle, ehkä siten pääset traumoistasi.
Nyt olisi hyvä hetki rauhoittua ainakin vähäksi aikaa. Tämä keskustelu tuntuu menevän ihan ylikierroksille. Jokaisella on oikeus mielipiteeseensä, kenenkään ei tarvitse ottaa niitä henkilökohtaisesti.
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Are the British Royal family a bunch of narcissists?
Living under a glass dome, cushioned by privilege, and surrounded by sycophants, or even just servants who are simply striving to do a good job, is not emotionally healthy for anyone. Character develops with the knowledge of a job well done, and with resisting temptation, and with standing against adversity. The royals seldom get the opportunity to be refined in the crucible, and some of that is not their fault. It is the responsibility of a nation to not indulge the weaknesses of a king, as the biblical stories of Saul, David, and Solomon remind us.
Even a person of strong character and outstanding integrity would soon get the message that they are better than the average pedestrian. The royals receive that message every day. You only have to read some of the posts here on Quora to see that there are people who will not hear a word spoken against the British Royals. They prefer to blame Diana for her own heartbreak, and a trafficked young woman for her own rape, and a black American divorced actress for her marginalisation.
Protecting anyone from the outcomes of their own self serving folly does not do such people good. They begin to believe in their own untouchable superiority.
The British royal family talk of service, and I have no doubt that they do perform services such as attending endless irrelevant openings wielding a freshly plated silver knife to cut the cake, or newly purchased silver scissors to cut the ribbon. They deliver a speech about world peace and carbon emissions, then climb back into an antique carriage drawn by horses and escorted by the military, to return to their castle where they are waited upon by staff, by which we mean servants.
Charles cries if his egg isnt cooked to precision. Andrew cries if a maid accidentally rearranges his teddies. Anne is admired for her rudeness. In her case, we extol her abruptness as good sense. We curtesy to a jolly horsewoman (now the Queen consort) who watched her friend cry because they were both sleeping with the Prince of Wales. Only one of them was his wife. It wasnt the jolly horsewoman.
TOXIC is a very strong word. Im not convinced that specific members of the British royal are toxic, so much as that they are surrounded by toxicity.
They grey suits in particular are reputed to be petty, spiteful, and cruel. The royals dont stand up to them, because no one wants to have a mismanaged diary. Dont forget those irrelevant flower show openings.
NARCISSUS is another very strong word. Im not convinced that the royal family are all narcissist, so much as they are surrounded by the opportunity to be so. I think that it takes a particular flaw in the character, coupled with the willingness to lie, and an inflated ego to create a narcissist. Not everyone has all three qualities.
The British Royal Family are a family of people with stunted emotional growth and an unbalanced sense of privilege.
Ei sairaalloinen narsismi synny tuolla tavoin. Narsismia on varmastikin jokaisessa ihmisessä jkv, mutta sairaalloinen narsismi ei kehity vain syntymällä etuoikeutettuun perheeseen. Toki he varmasti käyttäytyvät tiedostaen oikein hyvin asemansa, mutta se ei ole samaa kuin narsismi, ihan kuin tuossakin kirjoitetaan. Sen sijaan Meghanissa näen narsismin aidoimmillaan, oikein tyyppiesimerkillisesti.
Tietysti näet mitä tahdot. Mikä Meghanin lapsuudessa muka selittää pers.häiriön kehittymisen? Paljon epänormaalimpi ja traumaattisempi lapsuus harrylla ja willsillä on ollut.
Sen kun tietäis. Vaan kun en tiedä.
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Harry haukkuu perheensä. Harry on sen narsistiämmän käsinukke.
Harryn lapsuudenperhe narsisteja täynnä.
Meghan kohtelee häntä hyvin.
:D mistä joku tietää, että koko perhe on narsisteja?
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Vierailija kirjoitti:
William on käynyt kuitenkin yliopiston.
Niin? Tuskinpa olisi jos olisi normiperheen lapsi.
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Mistä hel vetistä sinä tiedät heidän perhesuhteistaan?
Heillä ei ole tapana käsitellä asioita julkisesti.Nään Williamin ja Charlesin teeskentelyn läpi.
Joku vois ottaa lääkkeet.
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Megsuhullulla raivo ja psykoosit tulilla. 🍿
Ehkä välillä haukkumaan marinin sannaa megsun ja harryn välissä?
Analysoimaan sannan nose jobeja. 😆Katen nose job tulikin jo käsiteltyä.
Jo. Kauneusleikkaushullu aka Katevihaaja unohti käsitellä liiallisen laihuuden.
Menepä sinä nyt käsittelemään sitten sannan narsismia ja nose jobia. :D :D
Mut siis kenen nenäjobeista on ok puhua? Katen? Camillan?
Sanna ei ole tehnyt. Meg ehkä. Harry ei, sen verran vino. Willian tuskin.
Miksi vaivaat päätäsi tuollaisilla? :D
Mitä väliä sillä sulle on onko joku leikkauttanut itseään? Kärsitkö jostain sairaudesta, joka pakottaa miettimään ulkonäköä 24/7? Sairasta. Anna muiden olla sen näköisiä kuin ovat ja analysoi sitä omaa lärviäsi ja ruhoasi vaikka.Niin just. Kate on kaunis ja älykäs. Upea suorastaan. Sairasta haukuntaa.
Sun palvonta ja pakkomielteet on sairasta.
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
William on käynyt kuitenkin yliopiston.
Niin? Tuskinpa olisi jos olisi normiperheen lapsi.
Ai? Miksei sit Hartsa käyny? Moni normiperheen lapsi käy.
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Mistä hel vetistä sinä tiedät heidän perhesuhteistaan?
Heillä ei ole tapana käsitellä asioita julkisesti.Nään Williamin ja Charlesin teeskentelyn läpi.
Joku vois ottaa lääkkeet.
Ota ihmeessä, sitä tässä on odotettu!
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Megsuhullulla raivo ja psykoosit tulilla. 🍿
Ehkä välillä haukkumaan marinin sannaa megsun ja harryn välissä?
Analysoimaan sannan nose jobeja. 😆Katen nose job tulikin jo käsiteltyä.
Jo. Kauneusleikkaushullu aka Katevihaaja unohti käsitellä liiallisen laihuuden.
Menepä sinä nyt käsittelemään sitten sannan narsismia ja nose jobia. :D :D
Mut siis kenen nenäjobeista on ok puhua? Katen? Camillan?
Sanna ei ole tehnyt. Meg ehkä. Harry ei, sen verran vino. Willian tuskin.
Miksi vaivaat päätäsi tuollaisilla? :D
Mitä väliä sillä sulle on onko joku leikkauttanut itseään? Kärsitkö jostain sairaudesta, joka pakottaa miettimään ulkonäköä 24/7? Sairasta. Anna muiden olla sen näköisiä kuin ovat ja analysoi sitä omaa lärviäsi ja ruhoasi vaikka.Niin just. Kate on kaunis ja älykäs. Upea suorastaan. Sairasta haukuntaa.
Sun palvonta ja pakkomielteet on sairasta.
Meghanin palvonta on toki eri juttu. Ei sairasta.
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Are the British Royal family a bunch of narcissists?
Living under a glass dome, cushioned by privilege, and surrounded by sycophants, or even just servants who are simply striving to do a good job, is not emotionally healthy for anyone. Character develops with the knowledge of a job well done, and with resisting temptation, and with standing against adversity. The royals seldom get the opportunity to be refined in the crucible, and some of that is not their fault. It is the responsibility of a nation to not indulge the weaknesses of a king, as the biblical stories of Saul, David, and Solomon remind us.
Even a person of strong character and outstanding integrity would soon get the message that they are better than the average pedestrian. The royals receive that message every day. You only have to read some of the posts here on Quora to see that there are people who will not hear a word spoken against the British Royals. They prefer to blame Diana for her own heartbreak, and a trafficked young woman for her own rape, and a black American divorced actress for her marginalisation.
Protecting anyone from the outcomes of their own self serving folly does not do such people good. They begin to believe in their own untouchable superiority.
The British royal family talk of service, and I have no doubt that they do perform services such as attending endless irrelevant openings wielding a freshly plated silver knife to cut the cake, or newly purchased silver scissors to cut the ribbon. They deliver a speech about world peace and carbon emissions, then climb back into an antique carriage drawn by horses and escorted by the military, to return to their castle where they are waited upon by staff, by which we mean servants.
Charles cries if his egg isnt cooked to precision. Andrew cries if a maid accidentally rearranges his teddies. Anne is admired for her rudeness. In her case, we extol her abruptness as good sense. We curtesy to a jolly horsewoman (now the Queen consort) who watched her friend cry because they were both sleeping with the Prince of Wales. Only one of them was his wife. It wasnt the jolly horsewoman.
TOXIC is a very strong word. Im not convinced that specific members of the British royal are toxic, so much as that they are surrounded by toxicity.
They grey suits in particular are reputed to be petty, spiteful, and cruel. The royals dont stand up to them, because no one wants to have a mismanaged diary. Dont forget those irrelevant flower show openings.
NARCISSUS is another very strong word. Im not convinced that the royal family are all narcissist, so much as they are surrounded by the opportunity to be so. I think that it takes a particular flaw in the character, coupled with the willingness to lie, and an inflated ego to create a narcissist. Not everyone has all three qualities.
The British Royal Family are a family of people with stunted emotional growth and an unbalanced sense of privilege.
Ei sairaalloinen narsismi synny tuolla tavoin. Narsismia on varmastikin jokaisessa ihmisessä jkv, mutta sairaalloinen narsismi ei kehity vain syntymällä etuoikeutettuun perheeseen. Toki he varmasti käyttäytyvät tiedostaen oikein hyvin asemansa, mutta se ei ole samaa kuin narsismi, ihan kuin tuossakin kirjoitetaan. Sen sijaan Meghanissa näen narsismin aidoimmillaan, oikein tyyppiesimerkillisesti.
Näet mitä haluat? Sä tuskin olet mikään narsismin asiantuntija tai lääkäri.
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Nyt olisi hyvä hetki rauhoittua ainakin vähäksi aikaa. Tämä keskustelu tuntuu menevän ihan ylikierroksille. Jokaisella on oikeus mielipiteeseensä, kenenkään ei tarvitse ottaa niitä henkilökohtaisesti.
Megsuhullu jeesustelee, kun ei saa manipuloitua ketjua haluamaansa suuntaan. :D
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Are the British Royal family a bunch of narcissists?
Living under a glass dome, cushioned by privilege, and surrounded by sycophants, or even just servants who are simply striving to do a good job, is not emotionally healthy for anyone. Character develops with the knowledge of a job well done, and with resisting temptation, and with standing against adversity. The royals seldom get the opportunity to be refined in the crucible, and some of that is not their fault. It is the responsibility of a nation to not indulge the weaknesses of a king, as the biblical stories of Saul, David, and Solomon remind us.
Even a person of strong character and outstanding integrity would soon get the message that they are better than the average pedestrian. The royals receive that message every day. You only have to read some of the posts here on Quora to see that there are people who will not hear a word spoken against the British Royals. They prefer to blame Diana for her own heartbreak, and a trafficked young woman for her own rape, and a black American divorced actress for her marginalisation.
Protecting anyone from the outcomes of their own self serving folly does not do such people good. They begin to believe in their own untouchable superiority.
The British royal family talk of service, and I have no doubt that they do perform services such as attending endless irrelevant openings wielding a freshly plated silver knife to cut the cake, or newly purchased silver scissors to cut the ribbon. They deliver a speech about world peace and carbon emissions, then climb back into an antique carriage drawn by horses and escorted by the military, to return to their castle where they are waited upon by staff, by which we mean servants.
Charles cries if his egg isnt cooked to precision. Andrew cries if a maid accidentally rearranges his teddies. Anne is admired for her rudeness. In her case, we extol her abruptness as good sense. We curtesy to a jolly horsewoman (now the Queen consort) who watched her friend cry because they were both sleeping with the Prince of Wales. Only one of them was his wife. It wasnt the jolly horsewoman.
TOXIC is a very strong word. Im not convinced that specific members of the British royal are toxic, so much as that they are surrounded by toxicity.
They grey suits in particular are reputed to be petty, spiteful, and cruel. The royals dont stand up to them, because no one wants to have a mismanaged diary. Dont forget those irrelevant flower show openings.
NARCISSUS is another very strong word. Im not convinced that the royal family are all narcissist, so much as they are surrounded by the opportunity to be so. I think that it takes a particular flaw in the character, coupled with the willingness to lie, and an inflated ego to create a narcissist. Not everyone has all three qualities.
The British Royal Family are a family of people with stunted emotional growth and an unbalanced sense of privilege.
Ei sairaalloinen narsismi synny tuolla tavoin. Narsismia on varmastikin jokaisessa ihmisessä jkv, mutta sairaalloinen narsismi ei kehity vain syntymällä etuoikeutettuun perheeseen. Toki he varmasti käyttäytyvät tiedostaen oikein hyvin asemansa, mutta se ei ole samaa kuin narsismi, ihan kuin tuossakin kirjoitetaan. Sen sijaan Meghanissa näen narsismin aidoimmillaan, oikein tyyppiesimerkillisesti.
Näet mitä haluat? Sä tuskin olet mikään narsismin asiantuntija tai lääkäri.
Sitähän sinä et voi tietää. Ehkä olen, ehkä en.
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Are the British Royal family a bunch of narcissists?
Living under a glass dome, cushioned by privilege, and surrounded by sycophants, or even just servants who are simply striving to do a good job, is not emotionally healthy for anyone. Character develops with the knowledge of a job well done, and with resisting temptation, and with standing against adversity. The royals seldom get the opportunity to be refined in the crucible, and some of that is not their fault. It is the responsibility of a nation to not indulge the weaknesses of a king, as the biblical stories of Saul, David, and Solomon remind us.
Even a person of strong character and outstanding integrity would soon get the message that they are better than the average pedestrian. The royals receive that message every day. You only have to read some of the posts here on Quora to see that there are people who will not hear a word spoken against the British Royals. They prefer to blame Diana for her own heartbreak, and a trafficked young woman for her own rape, and a black American divorced actress for her marginalisation.
Protecting anyone from the outcomes of their own self serving folly does not do such people good. They begin to believe in their own untouchable superiority.
The British royal family talk of service, and I have no doubt that they do perform services such as attending endless irrelevant openings wielding a freshly plated silver knife to cut the cake, or newly purchased silver scissors to cut the ribbon. They deliver a speech about world peace and carbon emissions, then climb back into an antique carriage drawn by horses and escorted by the military, to return to their castle where they are waited upon by staff, by which we mean servants.
Charles cries if his egg isnt cooked to precision. Andrew cries if a maid accidentally rearranges his teddies. Anne is admired for her rudeness. In her case, we extol her abruptness as good sense. We curtesy to a jolly horsewoman (now the Queen consort) who watched her friend cry because they were both sleeping with the Prince of Wales. Only one of them was his wife. It wasnt the jolly horsewoman.
TOXIC is a very strong word. Im not convinced that specific members of the British royal are toxic, so much as that they are surrounded by toxicity.
They grey suits in particular are reputed to be petty, spiteful, and cruel. The royals dont stand up to them, because no one wants to have a mismanaged diary. Dont forget those irrelevant flower show openings.
NARCISSUS is another very strong word. Im not convinced that the royal family are all narcissist, so much as they are surrounded by the opportunity to be so. I think that it takes a particular flaw in the character, coupled with the willingness to lie, and an inflated ego to create a narcissist. Not everyone has all three qualities.
The British Royal Family are a family of people with stunted emotional growth and an unbalanced sense of privilege.
Ei sairaalloinen narsismi synny tuolla tavoin. Narsismia on varmastikin jokaisessa ihmisessä jkv, mutta sairaalloinen narsismi ei kehity vain syntymällä etuoikeutettuun perheeseen. Toki he varmasti käyttäytyvät tiedostaen oikein hyvin asemansa, mutta se ei ole samaa kuin narsismi, ihan kuin tuossakin kirjoitetaan. Sen sijaan Meghanissa näen narsismin aidoimmillaan, oikein tyyppiesimerkillisesti.
Näet mitä haluat? Sä tuskin olet mikään narsismin asiantuntija tai lääkäri.
Se on kokemusasiantuntija. 😂
Sen äiti tai sisko tms. oli narsisti ja oli yksi tuttu Saija 80- tai 90-luvulla joka oli narsisti myös. 😂
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Are the British Royal family a bunch of narcissists?
Living under a glass dome, cushioned by privilege, and surrounded by sycophants, or even just servants who are simply striving to do a good job, is not emotionally healthy for anyone. Character develops with the knowledge of a job well done, and with resisting temptation, and with standing against adversity. The royals seldom get the opportunity to be refined in the crucible, and some of that is not their fault. It is the responsibility of a nation to not indulge the weaknesses of a king, as the biblical stories of Saul, David, and Solomon remind us.
Even a person of strong character and outstanding integrity would soon get the message that they are better than the average pedestrian. The royals receive that message every day. You only have to read some of the posts here on Quora to see that there are people who will not hear a word spoken against the British Royals. They prefer to blame Diana for her own heartbreak, and a trafficked young woman for her own rape, and a black American divorced actress for her marginalisation.
Protecting anyone from the outcomes of their own self serving folly does not do such people good. They begin to believe in their own untouchable superiority.
The British royal family talk of service, and I have no doubt that they do perform services such as attending endless irrelevant openings wielding a freshly plated silver knife to cut the cake, or newly purchased silver scissors to cut the ribbon. They deliver a speech about world peace and carbon emissions, then climb back into an antique carriage drawn by horses and escorted by the military, to return to their castle where they are waited upon by staff, by which we mean servants.
Charles cries if his egg isnt cooked to precision. Andrew cries if a maid accidentally rearranges his teddies. Anne is admired for her rudeness. In her case, we extol her abruptness as good sense. We curtesy to a jolly horsewoman (now the Queen consort) who watched her friend cry because they were both sleeping with the Prince of Wales. Only one of them was his wife. It wasnt the jolly horsewoman.
TOXIC is a very strong word. Im not convinced that specific members of the British royal are toxic, so much as that they are surrounded by toxicity.
They grey suits in particular are reputed to be petty, spiteful, and cruel. The royals dont stand up to them, because no one wants to have a mismanaged diary. Dont forget those irrelevant flower show openings.
NARCISSUS is another very strong word. Im not convinced that the royal family are all narcissist, so much as they are surrounded by the opportunity to be so. I think that it takes a particular flaw in the character, coupled with the willingness to lie, and an inflated ego to create a narcissist. Not everyone has all three qualities.
The British Royal Family are a family of people with stunted emotional growth and an unbalanced sense of privilege.
Ei sairaalloinen narsismi synny tuolla tavoin. Narsismia on varmastikin jokaisessa ihmisessä jkv, mutta sairaalloinen narsismi ei kehity vain syntymällä etuoikeutettuun perheeseen. Toki he varmasti käyttäytyvät tiedostaen oikein hyvin asemansa, mutta se ei ole samaa kuin narsismi, ihan kuin tuossakin kirjoitetaan. Sen sijaan Meghanissa näen narsismin aidoimmillaan, oikein tyyppiesimerkillisesti.
Näet mitä haluat? Sä tuskin olet mikään narsismin asiantuntija tai lääkäri.
Sitähän sinä et voi tietää. Ehkä olen, ehkä en.
Sen näkee hyvin, ettet ole. Olet omia traumojasi muihin projisoiva matalaälyinen narsu. :)
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Hänen äitiään kaltoinkohdeltiin, nyt vuorossa on Harry perheineen. Harryn viattomat lapset.
William ja Kate ovat kateellisia Harryn terveistä ja kauniista lapsista, tahtovat kiusaavina narsisteina päästä näpäyttämään näitäkin.
Varmasti :D
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Uusimpien uutisten valossa Katesta on paljastunut ilkeä ja rumasieluinen juonitteleva käärme. Kuka yllättyi?
Mene haukkumaan Sannaa välillä. :D
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
Vierailija kirjoitti:
William on käynyt kuitenkin yliopiston.
Niin? Tuskinpa olisi jos olisi normiperheen lapsi.
Ai? Miksei sit Hartsa käyny? Moni normiperheen lapsi käy.
Sitä ei kiinnostanut? Moni nuori ei mene yliopistoon vaikka äly riittäisi. Sinne menee myös vanhempiensa odotusten mukaan nuoria, joilla ei meinaa äly eikä moti riittää. Yliopistossa pärjää keskivertoälylläkin jos ei ole keskittymishäiriöitä ja perslihakset kestää. Ei siinä ole mitään erikoista, että on käynyt yliopiston. Kuninkaalliset sinne otetaan aina jos halua on, viis kyvyistä.
Alue: Aihe vapaa
William on käynyt kuitenkin yliopiston.