Tuleeko lockdown?

Ei. Koska on jo passi ja omaehtoinen karanteeni yms.

Ei

Masmisuositus ja koronapassi tulee

Ei, nyt luotetaan joululomaan.

Oikeasti koulut pk seudulla olis pitäny jo sulkea. Tällä viikollakaan enää mitään olla opittu. Paitsi lukemaan wilmasta jokapäiväiset tartunnat ja altistumismahdollisuudet.

...

Paul Kingsnorth: miksi vaihdoin puolta rokotesodassa

Mielenkiintoinen keskustelu.

Rokoteuskovaisellakin oli rajat ja ne ylitettiin, todella hienoa ja opettava tarina:

Paul Kingsnorth sees the vaccine wars as symptomatic of a bigger division between two fundamentally different world views: he calls them “thesis” and “antithesis.” When it comes to Covid, “thesis” is the establishment viewpoint: that lockdowns are needed to contain the virus, masks work, vaccines are safe, and people who question them are wrongheaded or worse. When Covid-19 first struck, Kingsnorth took the “thesis” viewpoint.

But over the last few months, his perspective changed. As he writes in today’s UnHerd, the crystallising moment arrived when he woke up to the news that the Austrian government had ‘interned an entire third of the population’. This move, he writes, sent a ‘chill down my spine’.

The “antithesis” view can be summed up as: lockdowns are not needed, masks do not work, the safety and efficacy of the vaccines are being oversold, vaccine passports will not only fail but further segregate society, and in the near future we can expect Giradian scapegoating of the unvaccinated. In other words, we are positioned on the precipice of a slippery slope that leads towards increasingly draconian biopolitical control measures, the grip of which is unlikely to release even once the pandemic is over.

In a conversation with Freddie Sayers on this week’s UnHerdTV, he explains this division and the bigger epistemological divides it reveals. “People are arguing about vaccines,” he says, “but they’re really under the surface arguing about what kind of person you are if you have taken these things, whether you’re a good or a bad person, or clean or unclean one”.

In Kingsnorth’s view, each of us has a line that cannot be crossed. And his has now been reached. 

Jotkut tämänkin palstan kiihkorokoteuskovaisista voisi oppia tästä paljon.

Ikävä kyllä tulee. Joku kirjotti just toisessa ketjussa, että päivystyksen numero (se 116117) ei vastaa eikä soita takaisin. Nyt mennään.

Vierailija kirjoitti:

Paul Kingsnorth: miksi vaihdoin puolta rokotesodassa

Valitsemasi evästeasetukset estävät tämän sisällön näyttämisen. Nähdäksesi sisällön sinun on hyväksyttävä Sanoman sisällönjakelukumppanien evästeet. Hyväksynnän jälkeen voimme näyttää sinulle sisältöä mm. YouTubesta, Facebookista, Twitteristä ja Instagramista.

Anna lupa evästeille

Mielenkiintoinen keskustelu.

Rokoteuskovaisellakin oli rajat ja ne ylitettiin, todella hienoa ja opettava tarina:

Paul Kingsnorth sees the vaccine wars as symptomatic of a bigger division between two fundamentally different world views: he calls them “thesis” and “antithesis.” When it comes to Covid, “thesis” is the establishment viewpoint: that lockdowns are needed to contain the virus, masks work, vaccines are safe, and people who question them are wrongheaded or worse. When Covid-19 first struck, Kingsnorth took the “thesis” viewpoint.

But over the last few months, his perspective changed. As he writes in today’s UnHerd, the crystallising moment arrived when he woke up to the news that the Austrian government had ‘interned an entire third of the population’. This move, he writes, sent a ‘chill down my spine’.

The “antithesis” view can be summed up as: lockdowns are not needed, masks do not work, the safety and efficacy of the vaccines are being oversold, vaccine passports will not only fail but further segregate society, and in the near future we can expect Giradian scapegoating of the unvaccinated. In other words, we are positioned on the precipice of a slippery slope that leads towards increasingly draconian biopolitical control measures, the grip of which is unlikely to release even once the pandemic is over.

In a conversation with Freddie Sayers on this week’s UnHerdTV, he explains this division and the bigger epistemological divides it reveals. “People are arguing about vaccines,” he says, “but they’re really under the surface arguing about what kind of person you are if you have taken these things, whether you’re a good or a bad person, or clean or unclean one”.

In Kingsnorth’s view, each of us has a line that cannot be crossed. And his has now been reached. 

Jotkut tämänkin palstan kiihkorokoteuskovaisista voisi oppia tästä paljon.

^!

Tulee, mukavaa. Saa taas käpertyä perheen kanssa mökin nurkkaan. Nami.

Vierailija kirjoitti:

Ikävä kyllä tulee. Joku kirjotti just toisessa ketjussa, että päivystyksen numero (se 116117) ei vastaa eikä soita takaisin. Nyt mennään.

Oho, toi on jo hälyttävää. Aina ennen on vastattu heti kun oon soittanu päivystysapuun. Oisko vaan henkilökuntapula jos kaikki oiski rokottamassa 😬

Jos nuolet ja imet tarpeeksi niin tulee