Lue keskustelun säännöt.
Miksi luterilaisuus (ja kalvinilaisuus muualla) on niin lakihenkistä?
12.03.2026 |
Erikoista mielestäni on se, että vaikka Luther ainakin alkuvaiheessa taisteli uskonvanhurskauden puolesta lakia, kirkon lakeja ja lakihenkistä omavanhurskauttta ja hyviä tekoja vastaan, tuntui hän itse langenneen lakihenkisyyteen myöhemmin ja ainakin koko luterilainen perinne ja Suomessa esim ns luterilainen ateismi on hyvin lakihenkistä yhteiskunnallista oikeamielisyyttä, työnteon arvostamista ja kaavamaista lakihenkistä toimintaa, myös kirkon jumalanpalveluksissa. Miksi Luther sällytti näitä monia muodollisia kaavoja ja jätti paavin kirkon messukaavan perusteet kirkkoon sekä vauvakasteen?= Johtuiko tämä osaksi siitä, että Lutheri ei päässyt irti mm juutalaisvihastaan tai siitä, että hän piti uskontekoja hyvinä tekoinan, joilla ei ollut niin merkitystä ja oli tse esimerkisi varmaan vatsanpalvoja ja läski ja piti paastoamista ihan turhana jumalanpalveluksena? Vastauksen tähän antaa aika hyvin raamatunopettajamme AI:
how did luther fight against the doctrine of legalism and why lutherans are still so legalistic?
AI-yhteenveto
Martin Luther fought against the doctrine of legalismthe belief that human effort, religious works, or adherence to laws can earn salvation or favor with Godby championing the doctrine of
justification by grace through faith alone (sola fide). He argued that righteousness is a gift received, not a merit earned. While modern Lutheranism emphasizes this grace-based theology, some perceive it as legalistic due to a strict adherence to doctrinal correctness (confessionalism), the rigorous, ongoing "use of the law" to convict of sin, and a formal liturgical tradition.
Reformed Faith & Practice +3
How Luther Fought Against Legalism
Luthers fight against legalism was both theological and practical, rooted in his study of Pauline epistles (Romans and Galatians).
Justification by Faith Alone (Sola Fide): Luther argued that humans are justified (declared righteous) before God by faith in Christ's atoning work alone, not by their own efforts. He insisted that good works are the result of salvation, not the cause.
Law-Gospel Dialectic: Luther developed a sharp distinction between the Law (Gods requirements) and the Gospel (Gods promise of grace). He taught that the Laws purpose is to show humans their inability to meet Gods standards, creating a need for the Gospels message of forgiveness.
Attack on Indulgences: His 95 Theses (1517) directly challenged the Roman Catholic practice of selling indulgences, which he viewed as a form of "methodological penitence" and a legalistic, transactional approach to forgiveness.
Rejection of Merit Theology: Luther rejected the medieval scholastic idea that human beings can contribute to their own salvation through merit or by following church-imposed rules (canon law).
"The Freedom of a Christian": In his 1520 treatise, he asserted that a Christian is perfectly free from the requirement to do good works for salvation, yet simultaneously a dutiful servant to their neighbor.
Reformed Faith & Practice +5
Kommentit (4)
Tuo on se irvikuva luterilaisuudesta.
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Sisältö jatkuu mainoksen alla
Luterilaiset maat Ruotsi, Suomi ja Tanska kehittyivät nykyaikaisiksi, moderneiksi yhteiskunniksi. Ahkera työnteko on luterilaista perimää. Martti Luther oli itse saksalainen.
Why Some View Modern Lutherans as "Legalistic"
Despite the anti-legalistic foundation, some observers or members describe modern Lutheranism as legalistic. This often stems from a misunderstanding of Lutheran theology or specific practices.
The "Third Use of the Law": Lutheranism retains the "law" as a guide for Christian living (the third use), which, if misunderstood, can feel like a rigid moral code.
Strict Doctrinal Conformity: Especially within "Confessional" Lutheranism (like the LCMS), there is a strong emphasis on consistent, orthodox doctrine and the "Book of Concord". This dedication to theological correctness can be perceived as dogmatic or "legalistic" by those outside that tradition.
Two-Kingdoms Doctrine: Lutherans believe that while Christians are free in their conscience (Kingdom of God), they are still subject to human laws and regulations in the earthly kingdom.
Formal Liturgy: Traditional Lutheran services are often highly liturgical (high church), which can be mistaken for legalism, whereas the formality is intended to focus on the Word and Sacraments.
The Inevitability of Sin: Because Lutheran theology stresses that believers are "simultaneously saint and sinner" (simul iustus et peccator), there is a constant, rigorous preaching of the law to highlight remaining sin, which some might experience as an overly punitive focus.
Reddit +4
In summary, Luther fought legalism by placing the focus entirely on Christ's work. Modern Lutherans may seem legalistic because they rigorously separate that message from the Law, which they continue to use for self-examination, and because of their high regard for doctrinal consistency.
on se n iin ja luterilaiusuudessahan ei opetetan juurikaan uskonkuuliaisuutta Jeesusta kohtaan vaan tullaan aina joka sunnuntai alttarille juomaan ehtoollista koska ollaan taas niin syntisiä
ja sitten jatketaan omaa elämää järjenpäätelmissä ja omassa tahdossa taas viikko ja koko elämä on omavoimaista lakihenkisyyttä ja yhteiskunnan normeissa suoritusta